SEC Filing | Casella Waste Systems, Inc.

================================================================================ UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q (Mark One) /X/ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended July 31, 2000 OR / / TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to . ---------- ---------- Commission file number 000-23211 CASELLA WASTE SYSTEMS, INC. --------------------------- (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 03-0338873 -------- ---------- (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 25 Greens Hill Lane, Rutland, Vermont 05701 ------------------------------------- ----- (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (802) 775-0325 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes /X/ No / / Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of September 5, 2000: Class A Common Stock 22,196,971 Class B Common Stock 988,200 ================================================================================

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CASELLA WASTE SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited) (In Thousands except per share amounts) ASSETS April 30, July 31, ------ 2000 2000 -------- -------- CURRENT ASSETS: Cash and Cash Equivalents $ 8,864 $ 15,600 Restricted Cash 17,609 16,434 Accounts Receivable - Trade, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $6,247 and $6,136 80,720 95,375 Accounts Receivable - Other 14,429 1,146 Notes Receivable - Officers/Employees 2,095 1,362 Prepaid Expenses 5,929 5,681 Inventory 10,986 8,666 Investments 5,156 10,584 Deferred Income Taxes 12,730 13,088 Other Current Assets 10,299 12,268 -------- -------- Total Current Assets 168,817 180,204 -------- -------- Property, Plant and Equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $97,152 and $108,122 379,086 391,156 Intangible Assets, net 294,283 306,609 Restricted Cash 10,881 10,932 Investment in Unconsolidated Subsidiaries 14,695 16,298 Other Non-Current Assets 4,415 8,025 -------- -------- 703,360 733,020 -------- -------- $872,177 $913,224 ======== ======== The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CASELLA WASTE SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited) (In Thousands except per share amounts) LIABILITIES AND April 30, July 31, STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 2000 2000 -------------------- --------- --------- CURRENT LIABILITIES: Current Maturities of Long-Term Debt $ 8,367 $ 7,998 Current Maturities of Capital Lease Obligations 788 788 Accounts Payable 43,335 51,150 Accrued Payroll and Related Expenses 5,536 4,988 Accrued Interest 3,994 7,421 Accrued Income Taxes 3,766 2,603 Accrued Closure and Post-Closure Costs, Current Portion 259 -- Deferred Revenue 3,317 6,377 Other Current Liabilities 15,153 19,274 --------- --------- Total Current Liabilities 84,515 100,599 --------- --------- Long-Term Debt, Less Current Maturities 440,804 453,050 --------- --------- Capital Lease Obligations, Less Current Maturities 3,748 3,531 --------- --------- Deferred Income Taxes 30,948 33,349 --------- --------- Accrued Closure and Post-Closure Costs, Less Current Maturities 12,017 12,969 --------- --------- Minority Interest 16,378 16,683 --------- --------- Other Long-Term Liabilities 9,049 9,022 --------- --------- COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Class A Common Stock - Authorized - 100,000 Shares, $0.01 par value Issued and Outstanding - 22,215 and 22,233 Shares as of April 30, 2000 and July, 31 2000, respectively 222 222 Class B Common Stock - Authorized - 1,000 Shares, $0.01 par value 10 Votes per Share, Issued and Outstanding -988 10 10 Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) (305) 5,123 Additional Paid-In Capital 270,655 271,212 Retained Earnings 4,136 7,454 --------- --------- Total Stockholders' Equity 274,718 284,021 --------- --------- $ 872,177 $ 913,224 ========= ========= The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CASELLA WASTE SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited) (In thousands except per share data) Three Months Ended -------------------- July 31, 1999 July 31, (Restated) 2000 -------- -------- Revenues $ 54,676 $157,067 -------- -------- Operating Expenses: Cost of Operations 30,636 108,848 General and Administration 7,644 17,430 Depreciation and Amortization 7,573 14,331 Merger Related Costs 1,490 -- -------- -------- 47,343 140,609 -------- -------- Operating Income 7,333 16,458 -------- -------- Other (Income)/Expense: Interest Income (73) (640) Interest Expense 1,676 10,551 Equity in Loss of OCI/New Heights -- 298 Minority Interest -- 190 Other Income (58) (145) -------- -------- Other Expenses, net 1,545 10,254 -------- -------- Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes and Discontinued Operations 5,788 6,204 Provision for Income Taxes 2,652 2,885 -------- -------- Net Income from Continuing Operations Before Discontinued Operations 3,136 3,319 -------- -------- Discontinued Operations: Loss from Discontinued Operations, net of Income Taxes (95) -- -------- -------- Net Income 3,041 3,319 ======== ======== The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CASELLA WASTE SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited) (In thousands except per share data) Three Months Ended ------------------------ July 31, 1999 July 31, (Restated) 2000 ---------- ---------- Earnings Per Share: Basic: Income from Continuing Operations Before Discontinued Operations $ 0.20 $ 0.14 Loss from Discontinued Operations $ (0.01) $ -- ---------- ---------- Net Income per Common Share $ 0.19 $ 0.14 ========== ========== Basic Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding 15,979 23,211 ========== ========== Diluted: Income from Continuing Operations Before Discontinued Operations $ 0.19 $ 0.14 Loss from Discontinued Operations $ (0.01) $ -- ---------- ---------- Net Income per Common Share $ 0.18 $ 0.14 ========== ========== Diluted Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding 16,539 23,889 ========== ========== The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CASELLA WASTE SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited) (In Thousands) Three Months Ended -------------------- July 31, July, 31 1999 2000 -------- -------- Cash Flows from Operating Activities: Net Income $ 3,041 $ 3,319 -------- -------- Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities - Depreciation and Amortization 7,573 14,331 Loss from Discontinued Operations 95 -- Gain on Sale of Fixed Assets (8) (169) Minority Interest -- 190 Changes in Assets and Liabilities, net of Effects of Acquisitions - Accounts Receivable (6,383) (13,922) Accounts Payable 40 7,815 Other Current Assets and Liabilities 4,795 10,056 -------- -------- 6,112 18,301 -------- -------- Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities 9,153 21,620 -------- -------- Cash Flows from Investing Activities: Acquisitions, Net of Cash Acquired (1,611) (3,761) Additions to Property and Equipment (16,069) (21,830) Proceeds from Sale of Equipment 21 568 Advances to Unconsolidated Subsidiaries -- (1,603) Other (2,043) (475) -------- -------- Net Cash Used in Investing Activities (19,702) (27,101) -------- -------- Cash Flows from Financing Activities: Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock -- 88 Proceeds from Equity Transactions of Majority- Owned Subsidiary -- 469 Proceeds from Exercise of Stock Options 219 -- Proceeds from Long-Term Borrowings 22,600 18,920 Principal Payments on Long-Term Debt (11,584) (7,260) -------- -------- Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities 11,235 12,217 -------- -------- Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents 686 6,736 Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Period 4,232 8,864 -------- -------- Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Period $ 4,918 $ 15,600 ======== ======== The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CASELLA WASTE SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited) (In Thousands) Three Months Ended -------------------- July 31, July, 31 1999 2000 -------- -------- Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information: Cash Paid During the Period for - Interest $ 1,605 $ 7,125 ======== ======== Income Taxes $ -- $ 861 ======== ======== Supplemental Disclosures of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities: Summary of Entities Acquired in Purchase Business Combinations Fair Market Value of Assets Acquired $ 1,611 $ 17,044 Cash Paid, net (1,611) (3,761) -------- -------- Exchange of Note Receivable $ -- $ 13,283 ======== ======== The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CASELLA WASTE SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (All amounts in thousands, except per share amounts) The condensed consolidated balance sheets of Casella Waste Systems, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the "Company") as of April 30, 2000 and July 31, 2000, the consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended July 31, 1999 and 2000 and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the three months ended July 31, 1999 and 2000 are unaudited. In the opinion of management, such financial statements include all adjustments (which include normal recurring and nonrecurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the periods presented. The Company has restated the previously issued consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended July 31, 1999 and the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the three months ended July 31, 1999 to reflect the effects of discontinued operations. The consolidated financial statements presented herein should be read in connection with the Company's audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the twelve months ended April 30, 2000. These were included as part of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Annual Report"). 1. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS During the three months ended July 31, 2000, the Company acquired six solid waste hauling operations in transactions accounted for as purchases. These transactions were in exchange for consideration of approximately $3.8 million in cash to sellers and the partial settlement of a receivable in the amount of $13.3 million. The operating results of these businesses are included in the Consolidated Statement of Operations from the dates of acquisition. The purchase prices have been allocated to the net assets acquired based on fair values at the dates of acquisition with the residual amounts allocated to goodwill. The following unaudited pro forma combined information shows the results of the Company's operations as though each of the acquisitions had been completed as of May 1, 1999. Three Months Ended Three Months Ended July 31, 1999 July 31, 2000 ------------- ------------- Revenues $ 139,980 $ 158,494 ============= ============= Operating Income $ 4,364 $ 16,761 ============= ============= Net Income $ (971) $ 3,363 ============= ============= Diluted Income per Share $ (0.04) $ 0.14 ============= ============= Weighted Average Diluted Shares Outstanding 23,691 23,889 ============= ============= The pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the actual results of operations had the acquisitions taken place as of May 1, 1999 or the results of future operations of the Company. Furthermore, the pro forma results do not give effect to all cost savings or incremental costs that may occur as a result of the integration and consolidation of the completed acquisitions. 2. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES In the normal course of its business and as a result of the extensive governmental regulation of the waste industry, the Company may periodically become subject to various judicial and administrative proceedings involving Federal, state or local agencies. In these proceedings, an agency may seek to impose fines on the Company or to revoke, or to deny renewal of, an operating permit held by the Company. In addition, the Company may become party to various claims and suits pending for alleged damages to persons and property, alleged violation of certain laws and for alleged liabilities arising out of matters occurring during the normal operation of the waste management business.

On or about October 30, 1997, Mr. Matthew M. Freeman commenced a civil lawsuit against the Company and two of its officers and directors in Vermont Superior Court. Mr. Freeman claims to have performed services for the Company prior to 1995 and in his lawsuit is seeking a three-percent equity interest in the Company or the monetary equivalent thereof, as well as punitive damages. The Company and the officers and directors have answered the Complaint, denied Mr. Freeman's allegations of wrongdoing, and asserted various defenses. In order to facilitate the completion of the initial public offering of the Company's Class A Common Stock in November 1997, certain stockholders of the Company agreed to indemnify the Company for any settlement by the Company or any award against the Company in excess of $350,000 (but not for legal fees paid by or on behalf of the Company or any other third party). The Company accrued a $215,000 reserve for this claim during the year ended April 30, 1998. On January 7, 2000, the City of Saco, Maine filed a notice of claims with the Company and Maine Energy Recovery Company LP ("Maine Energy") claiming entitlement to certain "residual cancellation" payments from Maine Energy under the waste handling agreement dated June 7, 1991 among the Biddeford-Saco Waste Handling Committee, Biddeford, Saco and Maine Energy on the basis of the satisfaction of certain conditions, including the acquisition of KTI, Inc. ("KTI") by the Company. The notice of claims alleges that the payments due to Saco exceed $33 million, and claims damages in such amounts for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duties and fraud and also claims treble damages of $100 million based on alleged fraudulent transfer of Maine Energy's assets. The notice also reserves the right to seek punitive damages. Although the City of Biddeford, Maine has not filed a notice of claims, it has given notice that it will be initiating a suit to receive the residual cancellation payments. Under the agreement, the aggregate amount to be paid upon the exercise of the put right is 18% of the fair market value of the equity of the partners in Maine Energy, and such amount is required to be paid within 120 days after the exercise of the put by the respective parties entitled thereto. The Company believes it has meritorious defenses to these claims. On or about April 26, 1999, Salvatore Russo filed an action in the U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey against KTI and two of its principal officers, Ross Pirasteh and Martin J. Sergi, purportedly on behalf of all shareholders who purchased KTI common stock from May 4, 1998 through August 14, 1998. Melanie Miller filed an identical complaint on May 14, 1999. The complaints allege that the defendants made material misrepresentations in KTI's quarterly report on form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 1998 in violation of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, concerning KTI's allowance for doubtful accounts and net income. The Plaintiffs are seeking undisclosed damages. The Company believes it has meritorious defenses to these complaints. On June 15, 1999, Mr. Russo and Ms. Miller, together with Fransisco Munero, Timothy Ryan and Steve Storch, moved to consolidate the two complaints. This motion is currently pending in the District Court of New Jersey. On or about March 24, 2000, a complaint was filed in the United States District Court, District of New Jersey against the Company, KTI, and three of KTI's principal officers, Ross Pirasteh, Martin J. Sergi, and Paul A. Garret. The complaint purported to be behalf of all shareholders who purchased KTI common stock from January 1, 1998 through April 14, 1999. The Complaint alleged that the defendants made unspecified misrepresentations regarding KTI's financial condition during the class period in violation of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The plaintiffs seek undisclosed damages. On or about April 6, 2000, the plaintiffs filed an amended class action complaint, which changes the class period covered by the complaint on behalf of all the defendants on July 21, 2000. The Company is a defendant in certain other lawsuits alleging various claims incurred in the ordinary course of business, none of which, either individually or in the aggregate, the Company believes are material to its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. The Company offers no prediction of the outcome of any of the proceedings described above. Under the terms of a Waste Handling Agreement between certain municipalities and the Company's majority owned subsidiary, Maine Energy, Maine Energy is obligated to make a payment either at the point in time that Maine Energy pays off its debt (as defined), which is currently estimated to occur between 2003 and 2005, or upon the consummation of an outright sale of Maine Energy. The estimated obligation has been recorded in other long-term liabilities as of July 31, 2000. 3. ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITIES The continuing business in which the Company is engaged is intrinsically connected with the protection of the environment. As such, a significant portion of the Company's operating costs and capital expenditures could be characterized as costs of environmental protection. While the Company is faced, in the normal course of business, with the need to expend funds for environmental protection and remediation, it does not expect such expenditures to have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations because its business is based upon compliance with environmental laws and regulations and its services are priced accordingly. In addition, as part of its ongoing operations, the Company provides for estimated closure and post-closure monitoring costs over the life of disposal sites as airspace is consumed. While all

these costs may increase in the future as a result of legislation or regulation, the Company believes that in general it tends to benefit when government regulation increases, since this may increase the demand for its services. Furthermore, the Company believes it has the resources and experience to manage environmental risk. 4. EARNINGS PER SHARE The following table reconciles the number of common shares outstanding at July 31 of each year indicated to the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and the weighted average number of common and potentially dilutive common shares outstanding for the respective three month periods for the purpose of calculating basic and dilutive earnings per common share: Three Months Three Months Ended Ended July 31, 1999 July 31, 2000 ------- ------- Number of Shares Outstanding, End of Period: Class A Common Stock 15,039 22,233 Class B Common Stock 988 988 Effect of Weighted Average Shares Outstanding for the Period (48) (10) ------- ------- Basic Shares Outstanding 15,979 23,211 Impact of Potentially Dilutive Securities 560 678 ------- ------- Diluted Shares Outstanding 16,539 23,889 ======= ======= For the three months ended July 31, 1999 and 2000, options to purchase 866 and 4,100 common shares, respectively, were excluded from the calculation of potentially dilutive securities because their impact was anti-dilutive. 5. SEGMENT REPORTING SFAS No. 131 "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information" establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments in financial statements. In general, SFAS No. 131 requires that business entities report selected information about operating segments in a manner consistent with that used for internal management reporting. The Company classifies its operations into Eastern, Central, Western, Power Generation, Residential Recycling, Finished Products and Commercial Recycling. The Company's revenues in the Eastern, Central and Western segments are derived mainly from one industry segment, which includes the collection, transfer, recycling and disposal of non-hazardous solid waste. The Company's revenues in the Power Generation, Residential Recycling, Finished Products and Commercial Recycling segments are derived from integrated waste handling services, including processing and recycling of wood, paper, metals, plastics and glass, municipal solid waste processing and disposal, specialty waste disposal, ash residue recycling, brokerage of recycled materials and the manufacturing of finished products using recycled materials. Any other activities in which the Company is engaged are not material to the total results of operations of the Company; these activities are reflected within the reporting structure outlined above.

Power Residential Eastern Central Western Generation Recycling -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Three Months Ended July 31, 2000: Outside Revenue $ 40,662 $ 30,717 $ 17,502 $ 7,680 $ 9,566 ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== Intersegment Revenue $ 10,956 $ 10,137 $ 3,599 $ 289 $ 6,343 ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== Net Income/(Loss) $ 1,664 $ 5,355 $ 1,986 $ (608) $ 847 ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== Total Assets $389,628 $133,958 $127,566 $ 59,644 $ 60,184 ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== Finished Commercial Products Recycling Corporate Eliminations Total -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Outside Revenue $ 15,773 $ 37,747 $ 1,085 $ (3,665) $157,067 ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== Intersegment Revenue $ 360 $ 9,402 $ 555 $(41,641) $ -- ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== Net Income/(Loss) $ (1,810) $ 1,159 $ (5,652) $ 378 $ 3,319 ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== Total Assets $ 46,795 $ 57,852 $ 47,517 $ (9,920) $913,224 ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== Three Months Ended July 31, 1999: Outside Revenue $ 9,550 $ 26,214 $ 18,819 $ -- $ -- ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== Intersegment Revenue $ 794 $ 8,854 $ 3,505 $ -- $ -- ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== Net Income/(Loss) $ 1,074 $ 2,420 $ 1,251 $ -- $ -- ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== Total Assets $ 42,562 $132,639 $104,751 $ -- $ -- ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== Finished Commercial Products Recycling Corporate Eliminations Total -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Outside Revenue $ -- $ -- $ 93 $ -- $ 54,676 ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== Intersegment Revenue $ -- $ -- $ -- $(13,153) $ -- ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== Net Income/(Loss) $ -- $ -- $ (1,704) $ -- $ 3,041 ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== Total Assets $ -- $ -- $ 20,687 $ -- $300,639 ======== ======== ======== ======== ========

6. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS The Company has entered into an agreement in July 2000 with Louisiana-Pacific Corp. to combine their respective cellulose insulation businesses into a single operating entity under a joint venture agreement effective August 1, 2000. The Company will contribute the operating assets of its cellulose insulation manufacturing business together with $2,500 in cash. The new Company, to be known as U.S. Green Fiber LLC, is an equally owned joint venture formed through the combination of Louisiana-Pacific's GreenStone Industries, Inc. and Casella Waste Systems' U.S. Fiber, Inc.'s operations. The new entity will supply cellulose insulation to existing residential construction, retail and manufactured housing supply channels. On June 28, 2000, the Company entered into an agreement with Berkshire Partners pursuant to which it agreed to sell Berkshire preferred stock, convertible into the Company's Class A Common Stock at $14.00 per share. The transaction closed August 11, 2000, when the Company received net proceeds of $55.2 million.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (" the Company") is a regional, integrated solid waste services company that provides collection, transfer, disposal and recycling services, generates steam and manufactures finished products utilizing recyclable materials primarily throughout the eastern portion of the United States and parts of Canada. The Company also markets recyclable metals, aluminum, plastics, paper and corrugated cardboard both processed at its facilities as well as recyclables purchased from third parties. The Company also generates electricity under its contracts with its two majority owned subsidiaries, Maine Energy Recovery Company LP ("Maine Energy") and Penobscot Energy Recovery Company LP ("PERC"), and through its wholly owned subsidiary, Timber Energy Recovery, Inc. ("TERI"). As of September 5, 2000, the Company owned and/or operated five Subtitle D landfills, two landfills permitted to accept construction and demolition materials, 39 transfer stations, 40 recycling processing facilities, 40 solid and liquid waste collection divisions, 5 power generation facilities, three finished products processing facilities and its interest in a cellulose insulation joint venture. The Company's revenues have increased from $54.7 million for the three months ended July 31, 1999 to $157.1 million for the three months ended July 31, 2000. From May 1, 1999 through April 30, 2000, the Company acquired 38 solid waste collection, transfer and disposal operations, as well as KTI, Inc ("KTI") in December 1999. Between May 1, 2000 and July 31, 2000, the Company acquired an additional six such businesses, all of which were accounted for under the purchase method of accounting for business combinations. Under the rules of purchase accounting the acquired companies' revenues and results of operations have been consolidated from the actual dates of the acquisitions and materially affect the period-to-period comparisons of the Company's historical results of operations. This Form 10-Q and other reports, proxy statements, and other communications to stockholders, as well as oral statements by the Company's officers or its agents, may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act, with respect to, among other things, the Company's future revenues, operating income, or earnings per share. Without limiting the foregoing, any statements contained in this Quarterly Report that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements, and the words "believes", "anticipates", "plans", "expects", and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. There are a number of factors of which the Company is aware that may cause the Company's actual results to vary materially from those forecasted or projected in any such forward-looking statement, certain of which are beyond the Company's control. These factors include, without limitation, those outlined below in the section entitled "Certain Factors That May Affect Future Results". The Company's failure to successfully address any of these factors could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations. General - ------- The Company's revenues are attributable primarily to fees charged to customers for solid waste collection and disposal, landfill, waste-to-energy, transfer and recycling services. The Company derives a substantial portion of its collection revenues from commercial, industrial and municipal services that are generally performed under service agreements or pursuant to contracts with municipalities. The majority of the Company's residential collection services are performed on a subscription basis with individual households. Landfill, waste- to-energy facility and transfer customers are charged a tipping fee on a per ton basis for disposing of their solid waste at the Company's disposal facilities and transfer stations. The majority of these customers are under one to three-year disposal contracts, with most having clauses for annual cost of living increases. Recycling revenues include the sale of recyclable commodities, operating and maintenance contracts of recycling facilities for municipal customers, recyclable brokering operations and revenue from the sale of tire derived fuel. The Company, as a result of the KTI acquisition, provides integrated waste handling services, including the processing and recycling of wood, paper, metals, aluminum, plastics and glass, municipal solid waste processing and disposal, specialty waste disposal, ash residue recycling, brokerage of recycled materials and the manufacturing of finished products, primarily cellulose insulation, using recyclable materials. Effective August 1, 2000, the Company contributed its cellulose insulation assets to a joint venture with Louisiana-Pacific, and accordingly, will recognize half of the joint venture's income/(loss) from that date forward. The Company emphasizes the use of low-cost processing to add value to the waste products delivered and, in some cases, the generation of electric power and steam. The Company operates these non-core businesses under four reportable lines of business segments: Power Generation, Residential Recycling, Commercial Recycling and Finished Products. These line of business segments are reflected in the Company's revenues as follows: Power Generation is

reflected under "disposal", Residential Recycling is reflected under "recycling", Commercial Recycling is reflected under "recycling and "brokerage", and Finished Products is reflected under its own line. The Company's revenues are shown net of intercompany eliminations. The Company typically establishes its intercompany transfer pricing based upon prevailing market rates. The table below shows, for the periods indicated, the percentage of the Company's revenues attributable to services provided. The decrease in the Company's collection revenues as a percentage of revenues in the current fiscal year is primarily attributable to the effects of the KTI acquisition. Significant recycling, finished products and brokerage revenues were added through that acquisition. The increase in the Company's landfill/disposal facilities revenues as a percentage of revenue in the first quarter of fiscal 2001 is primarily attributable to the effects of the KTI acquisition. Percentage of Revenues -------------------- Three Months Ended July 31, -------------------- 1999 2000 ------ ------ Collection.................................... 71.2% 42.8% Landfill/Disposal Facilities.................. 9.5 16.5 Transfer...................................... 8.7 5.5 Recycling..................................... 6.1 8.1 Finished Products............................. 0.0 8.6 Brokerage..................................... 0.0 13.6 Other......................................... 4.5 4.9 ------ ------ Total Revenues................................ 100.0% 100.0% ====== ====== Cost of operations includes labor, tipping fees paid to third party disposal facilities, fuel, maintenance and repair of vehicles and equipment, worker's compensation and vehicle insurance, the cost of purchasing materials to be recycled, third party transportation expense, district and state taxes, host community fees and royalties. Landfill operating expenses also include a provision for closure and post-closure expenditures anticipated to be incurred in the future, and leachate treatment and disposal costs. General and administrative expenses include management, clerical and administrative compensation and overhead, professional services and costs associated with the Company's marketing and sales force and community relations expense. Depreciation and amortization expense includes depreciation of fixed assets over the estimated useful life of the assets using the straight-line method, amortization of landfill airspace assets under the units-of-production method, and the amortization of goodwill and other intangible assets using the straight-line method. The amount of landfill amortization expense related to airspace consumption can vary materially from landfill to landfill depending upon the purchase price and landfill site and cell development costs. The Company depreciates all fixed and intangible assets, excluding non-depreciable land, down to a zero net book value, and does not apply a salvage value to any of its fixed assets. The Company capitalizes certain direct landfill development costs, such as engineering, permitting, legal, construction and other costs directly associated with expansion of existing landfills. Additionally, the Company also capitalizes certain third party expenditures related to pending acquisitions, such as legal and engineering. The Company will have material financial obligations relating to closure and post-closure costs of its existing landfills and any disposal facilities, which it may own or operate in the future. The Company has provided and will in the future provide accruals for future financial obligations relating to closure and post-closure costs of its landfills (generally for a term of 30 years after final closure of a landfill) based on engineering estimates of consumption of permitted landfill airspace over the useful life of any such landfill. There can be no assurance that the Company's financial obligations for closure or post-closure costs will not exceed the amount accrued and reserved or amounts otherwise receivable pursuant to trust funds. The Company routinely evaluates all such capitalized costs, and expenses those costs related to projects not likely to be successful. Internal and indirect landfill development and acquisition costs, such as executive and corporate overhead, public relations and other corporate services, are expensed as incurred.

Results of Operations - --------------------- The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the percentage relationship that certain items from the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements bear in relation to revenues. Percentage of Revenues -------------------- Three Months Ended July 31, -------------------- 1999 2000 ------ ------ Revenues 100.0% 100.0% Cost of Operations 56.0 69.3 General and Administration 14.0 11.1 Depreciation and Amortization 13.9 9.1 Merger Related Costs 2.7 0.0 ------ ------ Operating Income 13.4 10.5 Interest Expense, net 2.9 6.3 Equity Loss on Investment 0.0 0.2 Minority Interest 0.0 0.1 Other (Income)/Expense (0.1) (0.1) Provision for Income Taxes 4.9 1.9 ------ ------ Net Income Before Discontinued Operations 5.7 2.1 Discontinued Operations 0.2 0.0 ------ ------ Net Income 5.5 2.1 ====== ====== Adjusted EBITDA* 27.3 19.5 ====== ====== * See discussion and computation of adjusted EBITDA below. REVENUES: Revenues increased $102.4 million, or 187.2% to $157.1 million in the quarter ended July 31, 2000 from $54.7 million in the quarter ended July 31, 1999. Approximately $97.4 million of the increase was attributable to the impact of businesses acquired throughout fiscal 1999 and fiscal 2000, including KTI, which was acquired in December 1999. The balance of the increase of $5.0 million was attributable to internal volume and price growth, including the positive impact of higher average recyclable commodity prices in the current quarter compared to 1999. COST OF OPERATIONS: Cost of operations increased $78.2 million or 255.6% to $108.8 million in the quarter ended July 31, 2000 from $30.6 million in the quarter ended July 31, 1999. Cost of operations as a percentage of revenues increased to 69.3% in the quarter ended July 31, 2000 from 56.0% in the prior year. The increase in cost of operations as a percentage of revenues was primarily the result of acquiring KTI's recyclable brokerage operations, which carry high cost of operations as a percentage of revenues (approximately 90%). Brokerage comprised approximately 13.6% of the Company's revenues in the current quarter, versus 0% in the prior year. Additionally, the finished products line of business carries a much lower operating margin than the Company's core solid waste business operations. GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATION: General and administration expenses increased $9.8 million, or 128.0% to $17.4 million in the quarter ended July 31, 2000 from $7.6 million in the quarter ended July 31, 1999, but decreased as a percentage of revenues to 11.1% in the quarter ended July 31, 2000 from 14.0% in the quarter ended July 31, 1999. The decrease in general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues was primarily the result of acquiring KTI's recyclable brokerage operations, which carry low general and administrative costs as a percentage of revenues (approximately 4%). The general and administrative cost savings from acquiring KTI also contributed to the lower general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues in fiscal 2000.

DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION: Depreciation and amortization expenses increased $6.8 million, or 89.2%, to $14.3 million in the quarter ended July 31, 2000 from $7.6 million in the quarter ended July 31, 1999. Depreciation and amortization expenses as a percentage of revenue decreased to 9.1% in the quarter ended July 31, 2000 from 13.9% in the quarter ended July 31, 1999. The decrease in depreciation and amortization expenses as a percentage of revenues resulted from the Company's acquisition of KTI. KTI operations carry lower depreciation expense as a percentage of revenues (approximately 7%) than the Company (approximately 14.0%). MERGER-RELATED COSTS: Merger-related costs are comprised of legal, engineering, accounting and other costs associated with the two poolings of interests transactions consummated during the quarter ended July 31, 1999. No pooling transactions were closed in the quarter ended July 31, 2000, resulting in a decrease of $1.5 million, or 2.7% as a percentage of revenues. INTEREST EXPENSE, NET: Net interest expense increased $8.3 million, or 518.3% to $9.9 million in the quarter ended July 31, 2000 from $1.6 million in the quarter ended July 31, 1999. Interest expense, as a percentage of revenues increased to 6.3% in the quarter ended July 31, 2000 from 2.9% in the quarter ended July 31, 1999. This increase is primarily attributable to three factors: (i) a higher average debt balance in the current fiscal quarter, versus last year; (ii) the Company closed a new $450 million senior credit facility in December 1999 that raised the Company's borrowing cost by approximately 250 basis points; and (iii) the Company entered into new interest rate swap agreements that increased current rates in order to fix the interest rates on a portion of our debt. EQUITY LOSS ON INVESTMENT: This amount arises from the Company's investment in Oakhurst Company, Inc. of 35%, the initial interest in which was acquired as part of KTI. Oakhurst Company, Inc. owns 37.5% of New Heights Recovery and Power LLC ("New Heights"). The Company also has a direct ownership in New Heights of 12.5%. MINORITY INTEREST: This amount represents the minority owners' interest in the Company's majority owned subsidiaries, Maine Energy Recovery Company LP, Penobscot Energy Recovery Company LP and American Ash Recycling of Tennessee, Ltd. OTHER (INCOME)/EXPENSE: Other (income)/expense remained constant at $(0.1) million in the quarter ended July 31, 2000 unchanged from $(0.1) million in the quarter ended July 31, 1999. The other expense in fiscal 2000 is primarily attributable to gains on sale of fixed assets. PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES: Provision for income taxes increased $0.2 million, or 8.8%, to $2.9 million in the quarter ended July 31, 2000 from $2.7 million in the quarter ended July 31, 1999, but as a percentage of revenues, decreased to 1.9% from 4.9%. The effective tax rate increased to 46.5% in the quarter ended July 31, 2000 from 45.8% in the quarter ended July 31, 1999. The increase is primarily due to the Company's increase in profitability in the first quarter of 2001. Additional factors causing the provision for income taxes, as a percentage of pre-tax income to vary, were the increase in nondeductible goodwill and the equity loss in Oakhurst, poolings of interest resulting in prior period restatements of entities not liable for federal income tax due to Subchapter S Status, as well as non-deductibility of merger costs that were incurred in 1999. Liquidity and Capital Resources - ------------------------------- The Company's business is capital intensive. The Company's capital requirements include acquisitions, fixed asset purchases and capital expenditures for landfill development and cell construction, as well as site and cell closure. The Company had positive net working capital of $84.3 million and $79.6 million at April 30, 2000 and at July 31, 2000, respectively. The Company has a $450 million revolving line of credit with a group of banks for which FleetBoston is acting as agent. This line of credit consists of a $300 million Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility ("Revolver") and a $150 million Senior Secured Delayed Draw Term "B" Loan ("Term Loan"). This line

of credit is secured by all assets of the Company, including the Company's interest in the equity securities of its subsidiaries. The Revolver matures in December 2004 and the Term Loan matures in December 2006. Funds available to the Company under the line of credit were $54.1 million at July 31, 2000. On June 28, 2000, the Company entered into an agreement with Berkshire Partners pursuant to which it agreed to sell Berkshire preferred stock, convertible into the Company's Class A Common Stock at $14.00 per share. The transaction closed August 11, 2000, when the Company received net proceeds of $55.2 million. Net cash provided by operating activities amounted to $21.6 million for the quarter ended July 31, 2000 compared to $9.2 million for the same period of the prior fiscal year. The increase was primarily due to the increase in the Company's working capital, together with an increase in depreciation. Net cash used in investing activities was $27.1 million for the three months ended July 31, 2000 compared to $19.7 million for the same period last year. The increase in investing activities reflects mainly the Company's capital needs for acquisitions and fixed asset additions, reflecting the Company's continued growth by acquisition and development of revenue producing assets. The Company's cash needs to fund investing activities are expected to increase further as the Company continues to complete acquisitions. Net cash provided by financing activities was $12.2 million for the three months ended July 31, 2000 compared to $11.2 million for the same period of the prior fiscal year. These increases primarily reflect net borrowings on the Company's credit facility. Seasonality - ----------- The Company's transfer and disposal revenues have historically been lower during the months of November through March. This seasonality reflects the lower volume of waste during the late fall, winter and early spring months primarily because: (i) the volume of waste relating to construction and demolition activities decreases substantially during the winter months in the northeastern United States; and (ii) decreased tourism in Vermont, Maine and eastern New York during the winter months tends to lower the volume of waste generated by commercial and restaurant customers, which is partially offset by the winter ski industry. Since certain of the Company's operating and fixed costs remain constant throughout the fiscal year, operating income results are therefore impacted by a similar seasonality. In addition, particularly harsh weather conditions could result in increased operating costs to certain of the Company's operations. The residential recycling segment experiences increased volumes of newspaper in November and December due to increased newspaper advertising and retail activity during the holiday season. Additionally, the facilities located in Florida experience increased volumes of recyclable materials during the winter months, followed by decreases in the summer months in connection with seasonal changes in population. The commercial recycling segment experiences increased quantities of newspaper and corrugated containers in November and December, followed by reduced quantities in January and decreased quantities of newspaper and corrugated containers in July and August, followed by increased quantities in September, due to increased newspaper advertising and retail activity during the holiday season. The insulation business experiences lower sales in November and December because of lower production of manufactured housing due to holiday plant shutdowns. Inflation and Prevailing Economic Conditions - -------------------------------------------- To date, inflation has not had a significant impact on the Company's operations. Consistent with industry practice, most of the Company's contracts provide for a pass through of certain costs, including increases in landfill tipping fees and, in some cases, fuel costs. The Company therefore believes it should be able to implement price increases sufficient to offset most cost increases resulting from inflation. However, competitive factors may require the Company to absorb at least a portion of these cost increases, particularly during periods of high inflation. The Company's business is located in the eastern United States. Therefore, the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations are susceptible to downturns in the general economy in this geographic region and other factors affecting the region such as state regulations and severe weather

conditions. The Company is unable to forecast or determine the timing and/or the future impact of a sustained economic slowdown. Year 2000 Issues - ---------------- As of the date of this filing, the Company has not incurred any significant business disruptions as a result of Year 2000 issues. New Accounting Pronouncements - ----------------------------- In June 1999, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 137, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities-Deferral of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 133". SFAS No. 137 amends FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities", by deferring the effective date of SFAS No. 133 to fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2000. SFAS No. 133 establishes accounting and reporting standards requiring that every derivative instrument (including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) be recorded in the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value. SFAS No. 133 requires that changes in the derivative's fair value be recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. The Company will adopt SFAS No. 133 beginning May 1, 2001. The Company has yet to quantify the impacts of adopting SFAS No. 133 on its financial statements and has not determined the method of adoption. However, SFAS No. 133 could increase volatility in earnings and other comprehensive income. Adjusted EBITDA - --------------- Adjusted EBITDA represents operating income (earnings before interest and taxes, or "EBIT") plus depreciation and amortization expense less minority interest. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance under generally accepted accounting principles, but is provided because the Company understands that certain investors use this information when analyzing the financial position and performance of the Company. Three Months Ended July 31, ---------------------- (Restated) 1999 2000 ---------------------- Operating Income $ 7,333 $ 16,458 Depreciation and Amortization 7,573 14,331 Minority Interest 0 (190) --------- --------- Adjusted EBITDA $ 14,906 $ 30,599 ========= ========= EBITDA as a percentage of revenues 27.3% 19.5% ========= ========= Analysis of the factors contributing to the change in EBITDA is included in the discussions above. CERTAIN FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS The following important factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by forward-looking statements made in this Form 10-Q and presented elsewhere by management from time to time. WE MAY EXPERIENCE DIFFICULTIES INTEGRATING KTI'S OPERATIONS AND ASSETS. We acquired KTI on December 14, 1999. Since that time, we have experienced difficulties in integrating the operations of KTI and these difficulties have caused us to revise our publicly disclosed projections. There can be no assurance that we will not continue to experience difficulties in integrating KTI's operations effectively and that the acquisition will result in the synergies and other benefits anticipated by the two companies. Among other matters, in connection with the KTI acquisition we assumed certain obligations to finance and support a tire recycling joint venture. We cannot assure you that the joint venture will achieve projected financial results or not divert management resources.

OUR INCREASED LEVERAGE MAY IMPACT OUR ABILITY TO MAKE FUTURE ACQUISITIONS. As a result of the acquisition of KTI and the increase in our credit facility, our indebtedness has increased substantially. This increased indebtedness has resulted in increased borrowing costs, which have adversely impacted our operating results. In addition, the aggregate amount of indebtedness has limited and may continue to limit the Company's ability to incur additional indebtedness, and thereby may limit the Company's ongoing acquisition program. WE MAY NOT BE SUCCESSFUL IN MAKING ACQUISITIONS, WHICH COULD AFFECT OUR FUTURE GROWTH. Our strategy envisions that a substantial part of our future growth will come from making acquisitions. There can be no assurance that we will be able to identify suitable acquisition candidates and, once identified, to negotiate successfully their acquisition at a price or on terms and conditions favorable to us, or to integrate the operations of such acquired businesses with our operations. Certain of these acquisitions may be of significant size and may include assets that are outside our geographic territories or are ancillary to our core business strategy. In addition, due to the increased consolidation of the solid waste industry and our current size, we cannot assure you that we will be able to make acquisitions in the future at a rate consistent with our historical growth rate. WE ARE DEPENDENT ON THE MEMBERS OF OUR SENIOR MANAGEMENT TEAM. We are highly dependent upon the services of the members of our senior management team, the loss of any of whom may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, our future success depends on our continuing ability to identify, hire, train, motivate and retain highly trained personnel. We may be in default under our credit facility if both John Casella and James Bohlig cease to be employed by us. OUR ABILITY TO MAKE ACQUISITIONS IS DEPENDENT ON THE AVAILABILITY OF ADEQUATE CASH AND THE ATTRACTIVENESS OF OUR STOCK PRICE. We anticipate that any future business acquisitions will be financed through cash from operations, borrowings under our bank line of credit, the issuance of shares of our Class A Common Stock and/or seller financing. There can be no assurance that we will have sufficient existing capital resources, that our stock price will be sufficiently attractive for use in an acquisition or that we will be able to raise sufficient additional capital resources on terms satisfactory to us, if at all, in order to meet our capital requirements. We also believe that a significant factor in our ability to close acquisitions will be the attractiveness of our Class A common stock as consideration for potential acquisition candidates. This attractiveness may, in large part, be dependent upon the relative market price and capital appreciation prospects of our Class A common stock compared to the equity securities of our competitors. The recent declines in the market price of our Class A common stock could materially adversely affect our acquisition program. ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS COULD SUBJECT US TO FINES, PENALTIES AND LIMITATIONS ON OUR ABILITY TO EXPAND We are subject to potential liability and restrictions under environmental laws. Our waste-to-energy and manufacturing facilities are subject to regulations limiting discharges of pollution into the air and water, and the solid waste operations are subject to a wide range of Federal, state and, in some cases, local environmental and land use restrictions. If we are not able to comply with the requirements that apply to a particular facility, we could be subject to fines and penalties, and we may be required to spend large amounts to bring an operation into compliance or to temporarily or permanently stop an operation that is not permitted under the law. Those costs or actions could have a material adverse effect upon our business, financial condition and results of operations. Environmental and land use laws also can have an impact on whether our operations can expand and, in the case of our solid waste operations, may dictate those geographic areas from which we must, or, from which we may not, accept waste. The waste management industry has been and likely will continue to be subject to regulation, as well as to attempts to further regulate the industry through new legislation. Those regulations and laws also may limit the overall size and daily waste volume that may be accepted by a solid waste operation. If we are not able to expand or otherwise operate one or more of our facilities profitably

because of limits imposed under environmental laws, we may be required to increase our utilization of disposal facilities owned by third parties, and if so, our business, financial condition and results of operations could suffer a material adverse effect. We have grown through acquisitions, and we have tried to evaluate and address environmental risks and liabilities presented by newly acquired businesses as we have identified them. It is possible that some liabilities, including ones that may exist only because of the past operations of an acquired business, may prove to be more difficult or costly to address than we anticipate. It is also possible that government officials responsible for enforcing environmental laws may believe an issue is more serious than we would expect, or that we will fail to identify or fully appreciate a historic liability before we become legally responsible to address it. Some of the legal sanctions to which we could become subject could cause us to lose a needed permit, or prevent us from or delay us in obtaining or renewing permits to operate our facilities. The number, size and nature of those liabilities could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial conditions and results of operations. Our operating program depends on our ability to operate and expand the landfills we own and lease and to develop new landfill sites. Several of our landfills are subject to local laws purporting to regulate their expansion and other aspects of their operations. There can be no assurance that the laws adopted by municipalities in which our landfills are located will not have a material adverse effect on our utilization of our landfills or that we will be successful in obtaining new landfill sites or expanding the permitted capacity of any of our current landfills once their remaining disposal capacity has been consumed. OUR RESULTS OF OPERATIONS COULD BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY CHANGING PRICES OR MARKET REQUIREMENTS FOR RECYCLABLE MATERIALS Our results of operations may be materially adversely affected by changing purchase or resale prices or market requirements for recyclable materials. Our recycling business involves the purchase and sale of recyclable materials, some of which are priced on a commodity basis. The resale and purchase prices of, and market demand for, recyclable materials, particularly waste paper, plastic and ferrous and aluminum metals, can be volatile due to numerous factors beyond our control. These changes have in the past contributed, and may continue to contribute, to significant variability in our period-to-period results of operations. Some of our subsidiaries involved in the recycling business use long-term supply contracts with customers with floor price arrangements to minimize the commodity risk for recyclable materials, particularly waste paper and aluminum metals. Under these contracts, our subsidiaries obtain a guaranteed minimum floor price for the recyclable materials along with a commitment to receive additional amounts if the current market price rises above the minimum price. These contracts are generally with large domestic companies, which use the recyclable materials in their manufacturing processes. Any failure to continue to secure long-term supply contracts with minimum price arrangements, or a breach by customers of one or more of these contracts could reduce our recycling revenues and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. THE SEASONALITY OF OUR REVENUES COULD ADVERSELY IMPACT OUR FINANCIAL CONDITION Future seasonal fluctuations in our revenues could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our revenues have historically been lower during the months of November through March. This seasonality reflects the lower volume of solid waste during the late fall, winter and early spring months resulting primarily from: - the volume of solid waste relating to construction and demolition activities decreasing substantially during the winter months in the northeastern United States; and - decreased tourism in Vermont, Maine, New Hampshire and eastern New York during the winter months, which tends to lower the volume of solid waste generated by commercial and restaurant customers, which is only partially offset by the winter ski industry. The residential recycling segment experiences increased volumes of newspaper in November and December due to increased newspaper advertising and retail activity during the holiday season. Additionally, the facilities located in Florida experience increased volumes of recyclable materials during the winter months, followed by decreases in the summer months in connection with seasonal changes in population. The commercial recycling segment experiences increased quantities of newspaper and corrugated containers in November and December, followed by reduced quantities in January and decreased quantities of newspaper and corrugated containers in July and August, followed by increased quantities in September, due to increased newspaper advertising and retail activity during the holiday season. The insulation business experiences lower sales in November and December because of lower production of manufactured housing due to holiday plant shutdowns. Since some of our operating and fixed costs remain constant throughout the fiscal year, our operating income is seasonally impacted. In addition, particularly harsh weather conditions could result in increased operating costs for some of our operations.

OUR BUSINESS IS GEOGRAPHICALLY CONCENTRATED AND IS THEREFORE SUBJECT TO REGIONAL ECONOMIC DOWNTURNS Our operations and customers are principally located in the eastern United States. Therefore, our business, financial condition and results of operations are susceptible to regional economic downturns and other regional factors, including state regulations and severe weather conditions. In addition, as we expand in our existing markets, opportunities for growth within these regions will become more limited. The costs and time involved in permitting and the scarcity of available landfills will make it difficult for us to expand vertically in these markets. We cannot assure you that we will complete acquisitions in other markets to lessen our regional geographic concentration. MAINE ENERGY MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAKE A PAYMENT IN CONNECTION WITH THE PAYOFF OF THE MAINE ENERGY BONDS WHICH EXCEEDS THE AMOUNT OF THE LIABILITY WE RECORDED IN CONNECTION WITH THE KTI ACQUISITION Under the terms of the waste handling agreement dated June 7, 1991 among the Biddeford-Saco Waste Handling Committee, Biddeford, Saco and Maine Energy, Maine Energy may be required, following the date on which the bonds financing Maine Energy and certain limited partner loans to Maine Energy are paid in full, to pay an aggregate of 18% of the fair market value of the equity of the partners in Maine Energy to the respective municipalities party to that agreement. In connection with the acquisition of KTI, the Company estimated the fair market value of Maine Energy as of the date the bonds are assumed to be paid in full, and recorded a liability equal to 18% of such amount. We cannot assure you that our estimate of the fair market value of Maine Energy will prove to be accurate, and in the event we have underestimated the value of Maine Energy, we could be required to recognize unanticipated charges, in which case our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity could be materially adversely affected. WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO EFFECTIVELY COMPETE IN THE HIGHLY COMPETITIVE SOLID WASTE SERVICES INDUSTRY The solid waste services industry is highly competitive, is undergoing a period of increasingly rapid consolidation, and requires substantial labor and capital resources. Some of the markets in which we compete or will likely compete are served by one or more of the large national or multinational solid waste companies, as well as numerous regional and local solid waste companies. Intense competition exists not only to provide services to customers, but also to acquire other businesses within each market. Some of our competitors have significantly greater financial and other resources than us. From time to time, competitors may reduce the price of their services in an effort to expand market share or to win a competitively bid municipal contract. These practices may either require us to reduce the pricing of our services or result in our loss of business. As is generally the case in the industry, municipal contracts are subject to periodic competitive bidding. There can be no assurance that we will be the successful bidder to obtain or retain these contracts. If we are unable to compete with larger and better capitalized companies, or to replace municipal contracts lost through the competitive bidding process with comparable contracts or other revenue sources within a reasonable time period, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In our solid waste disposal markets, we also compete with operators of alternative disposal and recycling facilities and with counties, municipalities and solid waste districts that maintain their own waste collection, recycling and disposal operations. These entities may have financial advantages because user fees or similar charges, tax revenues and tax-exempt financing may be more available to them than to us. Our finished products divisions and our insulation manufacturing joint venture with Louisiana-Pacific compete with other parties, some of which have substantially greater resources than we do, which they could use for product development, marketing or other purposes to our detriment. ONE OF OUR SUBSIDIARIES SELLS ITS ENTIRE OUTPUT TO A FEW CUSTOMERS AND LACKS THE CAPACITY TO MEET ALL OF ITS COMMITMENTS One of our subsidiaries operates three steam generating plants, one of which produces steam for a facility owned by E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company under a five-year contract expiring on May 30, 2003. Du Pont has significantly reduced operations at this facility, and has the option to terminate the contract upon

payment of a termination fee. The second plant produces steam for an industrial park. Approximately 85% of the steam produced by the plant is purchased by one customer under a contract that may not be terminated by the customer except for cause, and the balance is sold to ten customers under contracts, which provide that our subsidiary may elect not to supply steam. Currently, maximum contracted capacity for all customers for steam exceeds the maximum rated capacity of this plant. Actual demand, however, has not exceeded the maximum rated capacity. If actual demand grows, the plant may need to install equipment to respond to peak demands, as well as equipment, which may be necessary to allow the plant to meet stricter air quality standards, which may be adopted in the near future. The cost of this air quality equipment, not including the equipment necessary to respond to peak demands, is expected to be approximately $1.2 million. We have closed the third steam generating plant, which sold all of its output to a customer which has filed for bankruptcy. The termination of the contract with du Pont or any of the significant customers who purchase steam from our subsidiary or its subsidiary could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. OUR RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION MAY BE NEGATIVELY AFFECTED IF WE INADEQUATELY ACCRUE FOR CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE COSTS We have material financial obligations relating to closure and post-closure costs of our existing landfills and will have material financial obligations with respect to any disposal facilities, which we may own or operate in the future. In addition to the landfills we currently operate, we own four unlined landfills, which are not currently in operation. We have provided and will in the future provide accruals for financial obligations relating to closure and post-closure costs of our owned or operated landfills, generally for a term of 30 years after final closure of a landfill. We cannot assure you that our financial obligations for closure or post-closure costs will not exceed the amount accrued and reserved or amounts otherwise receivable pursuant to trust funds established for this purpose. Such a circumstance could result in unanticipated charges and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. WE COULD BE PRECLUDED FROM ENTERING INTO CONTRACTS OR OBTAINING PERMITS IF WE ARE UNABLE TO OBTAIN THIRD PARTY FINANCIAL ASSURANCE TO SECURE OUR CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS Municipal solid waste collection and recycling contracts, obligations associated with landfill closure and post closure and the operation and closure of waste-to-energy facilities may require performance or surety bonds, letters of credit or other means of financial assurance to secure our contractual performance. If we are unable to obtain the necessary financial assurance in sufficient amounts or at acceptable rates, we could be precluded from entering into additional municipal solid waste collection contracts or from obtaining or retaining landfill operating permits. Any future difficulty in obtaining insurance could also impair our ability to secure future contracts conditioned upon the contractor having adequate insurance coverage. Accordingly, our failure to obtain financial assurance bonds, letters of credit or other means of financial assurance or to maintain adequate insurance could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. WE MAY BE REQUIRED TO WRITE-OFF CAPITALIZED CHARGES IN THE FUTURE, WHICH COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR EARNINGS Any charge against earnings could have a material adverse effect on our earnings and the market price of our Class A common stock. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, we capitalize certain expenditures and advances relating to our acquisitions, pending acquisitions, landfills and development projects. From time to time in future periods, we may be required to incur a charge against earnings in an amount equal to any unamortized capitalized expenditures and advances, net of any portion thereof that we estimate will be recoverable, through sale or otherwise, relating to (a) any operation that is permanently shut down or has not generated or is not expected to generate sufficient cash flow, (b) any pending acquisition that is not consummated and (c) any landfill or development project that is not expected to be successfully completed. We have incurred such charges in the past. OUR CLASS B COMMON STOCK HAS TEN VOTES PER SHARE AND IS HELD EXCLUSIVELY BY JOHN W. CASELLA AND DOUGLAS R. CASELLA The holders of our Class B common stock are entitled to ten votes per share and the holders of our Class A common stock are entitled to one vote per share. At July 21, 2000, an aggregate of 988,200 shares of our

Class B common stock, representing 9,882,000 votes, were outstanding, all of which were beneficially owned by John W. Casella, our president and chief executive officer, or by his brother, Douglas R. Casella, a director. Based on the number of shares of common stock outstanding at September 5, 2000, the shares of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock held by John W. Casella and Douglas R. Casella represent approximately 34.4% of the aggregate voting power of our stockholders. Consequently, John W. Casella and Douglas R. Casella will be able to substantially influence all matters for stockholder consideration. Part II. OTHER INFORMATION Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS On or about October 30, 1997, Mr. Matthew M. Freeman commenced a civil lawsuit against the Company and two of its officers and directors in Vermont Superior Court. Mr. Freeman claims to have performed services for the Company prior to 1995 and in his lawsuit is seeking a three-percent equity interest in the Company or the monetary equivalent thereof, as well as punitive damages. The Company and the officers and directors have answered the Complaint, denied Mr. Freeman's allegations of wrongdoing, and asserted various defenses. In order to facilitate the completion of the initial public offering of the Company's Class A Common Stock in November 1997, certain stockholders of the Company agreed to indemnify the Company for any settlement by the Company or any award against the Company in excess of $350,000 (but not for legal fees paid by or on behalf of the Company or any other third party). The Company accrued a $215,000 reserve for this claim during the year ended April 30, 1998. The Company's wholly owned subsidiary, North Country Environmental Services, Inc. ("NCES"), is a party to an appeal against the Town of Bethlehem, New Hampshire ("Town") before the New Hampshire Supreme Court. The appeal arises from cross actions for declaratory and injunctive relief filed by NCES and the Town to determine the permitted extent of NCES's landfill in the Town. The Grafton Superior Court ruled on February 1, 1999 that the Town could not enforce an ordinance purportedly prohibiting expansion of the landfill, at least within 51 acres of NCES's 87-acre parcel, based upon certain existing land-use approvals. As a result, NCES was able to construct and operate "Stage II, Phase II" of the landfill. If the Town were to prevail on appeal, the range of possible outcomes includes, without limitation, a new trial, closure of the landfill, or remediation (i.e., removal) of Stage II, Phase II. A separate appeal by two citizens groups of the construction and operating approvals issued by the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services to NCES for Stage II, Phase II has been stayed by the New Hampshire Waste Management Council pending the resolution of the appeal before the Supreme Court On or about December 7, 1999, Earth Waste Systems, Inc., Kevin Elnicki and Frank Elnicki filed a civil lawsuit against the Company, two of the Company's officers and directors, and a former employee in Vermont State Court, Rutland County. The plaintiffs allege that the Company and the individual defendants breached contractual obligations and engaged in other wrongdoing related to, among other things, a now terminated scrap metal agreement. Plaintiffs are seeking monetary damages, including punitive damages, in an unspecified amount. On May 12, 2000, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the case on jurisdictional grounds, on which the Court has not yet ruled. The Company believes it has meritorious defenses to this lawsuit. The Company has brought an action against the Town of Hampden, Maine to set aside the Town's efforts to block the Company's construction of approximately 3,100,000 tons of capacity, for which the Company has been granted a permit by the State of Maine. The action is pending in the Penobscot County Superior Court in Bangor, Maine. The Company is a defendant in a lawsuit brought by Woodstock '99, LLC seeking damages for breach of two service contracts entered into by the Company for the servicing of portable chemical toilets during the Woodstock Concert held in Rome, N.Y. in late July 1999. Woodstock '99, LLC is seeking damages of up to $2,000,000. The Company intends to vigorously defend the lawsuit and has filed its Answer and Counterclaim, along with extensive discovery requests. On April 1, 1999, William F. Kaiser, a former Executive Vice President and Treasurer of KTI, filed a lawsuit against KTI in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. The suit alleges breach of contract, wrongful termination, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, misrepresentation of employment terms and failure to pay wages, all arising out of Mr. Kaiser's employment agreement with KTI. The suit also alleges that KTI inaccurately reported its financial results

for the first quarter of 1998 and failed to properly disclose the change of control provision in Mr. Kaiser's employment agreement. Mr. Kaiser is seeking a declaratory judgment that, upon closing of the merger, the change of control provision entitles him to receive a severance payment of two years' salary, in the amount of $320,000, and to exercise 132,000 unvested options for KTI common stock. Mr. Kaiser is also seeking damages in the amount of $40,000 for an additional severance payment, as well as undisclosed damages for outstanding salary, bonus and other payments and from his sale of approximately 20,000 shares of KTI common stock resulting from KTI's allegedly inaccurate financial reports. On or about April 26, 1999, Salvatore Russo filed an action in the U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey against KTI and two of its principal officers, Ross Pirasteh and Martin J. Sergi, purportedly on behalf of all shareholders who purchased KTI common stock from May 4, 1998 through August 14, 1998. Melanie Miller filed an identical complaint on May 14, 1999. The complaints allege that the defendants made material misrepresentations in KTI's quarterly report on form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 1998 in violation of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, concerning KTI's allowance for doubtful accounts and net income. The Plaintiffs are seeking undisclosed damages. The Company believes it has meritorious defenses to these complaints. On June 15, 1999, Mr. Russo and Ms. Miller, together with Fransisco Munero, Timothy Ryan and Steve Storch, moved to consolidate the two complaints. This motion is currently pending in the District Court of New Jersey. On May 11, 2000, The Company was granted a permit modification by the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services to increase the volume of solid waste processed and stored at its GDS transfer station in Newport, New Hampshire. On or about June 12, 2000, a local environmental activist appealed the permit modification to the New Hampshire Waste Management Council. The appeal claims that the modification will lead to adverse environmental impacts through higher waste flows and increased levels of incineration at a nearby waste-to-energy facility, that the Company has been the subject of "complaints" arising from its New England and New York operations, and that the Company has failed to demonstrate that the modification is consistent with the waste management plan of the local waste management district. The Company expects to seek a dismissal of the appeal for the appellant's lack of standing. On January 7, 2000, the City of Saco, Maine filed a notice of claims with the Company and Maine Energy claiming entitlement to certain "residual cancellation" payments from Maine Energy under the waste handling agreement dated June 7, 1991 among the Biddeford-Saco Waste Handling Committee, Biddeford, Saco and Maine Energy on the basis of the satisfaction of certain conditions, including the acquisition of KTI by the Company. The notice of claims alleges that the payments due to Saco exceed $33 million, and claims damages in such amounts for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duties and fraud and also claims treble damages of $100 million based on alleged fraudulent transfer of Maine Energy's assets. The notice also reserves the right to seek punitive damages. Although the City of Biddeford, Maine has not filed a notice of claims, it has given noticed that it will be initiating a suit to receive the residual cancellation payments. Under the agreement, the aggregate amount to be paid upon the exercise of the put right is 18% of the fair market value of the equity of the partners in Maine Energy, and such amount is required to be paid within 120 days after the exercise of the put by the respective parties entitled thereto. The Company believes it has meritorious defenses to these claims. On or about March 24, 2000, a complaint was filed in the United States District Court, District of New Jersey against the Company, KTI, and three of KTI's principal officers, Ross Pirasteh, Martin J. Sergi, and Paul A. Garret. The complaint purported to be behalf of all shareholders who purchased KTI common stock from January 1, 1998 through April 14, 1999. The Complaint alleged that the defendants made unspecified misrepresentations regarding KTI's financial condition during the class period in violation of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The plaintiffs seek undisclosed damages. On or about April 6, 2000, the plaintiffs filed an amended class action complaint, which changes the class period covered by the complaint on behalf of all the defendants on July 21, 2000. The Company is a defendant in certain other lawsuits alleging various claims incurred in the ordinary course of business. The Company offers no prediction of the outcome of any of the proceedings described above. ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES Changes in Rights and Classes of Stock

On August 11, 2000, the Company completed the sale of 55,750 shares of its Series A Convertible Preferred Stock ("the "Series A Preferred Stock") for approximately $55.2 million of net proceeds. The Company sold the Series A Preferred Stock pursuant to that certain Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 28, 2000, by and among the Company and the Purchasers identified therein (the "Agreement"). Each share of Series A Preferred Stock issued in the transaction is convertible, at any time and from time to time, into shares of the Company's Class A Common Stock, at an initial conversion price of $14 per share. The conversion price is subject to adjustment if the Company (i) subdivides its common stock by effecting a stock split or stock dividend, or (ii) subject to certain exceptions, issues or sells additional shares of common stock or securities convertible into common stock for less than $14 per share. The Series A Preferred Stock accrues preferential dividends daily and on a cumulative basis at an annual rate of five percent (5%) of its liquidation value, as defined in the Agreement, payable quarterly in arrears in additional shares of Series A Preferred Stock through August 11, 2003 and thereafter, at the option of the Company, in either cash or additional shares of Series A Preferred Stock. At any time on or after the occurrence of a change of control and for a period of 30 days thereafter, holders of Series A Preferred Stock will have the right to require the Company to redeem all or a portion of their stock at a redemption price equal to its liquidation value. All outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock are subject to mandatory redemption by the Company on August 11, 2007 pursuant to the terms of the Agreement. The Purchasers are entitled to nominate one person who shall be included among the Company's nominees for election to the Board of Directors as the Purchaser Director for so long as they hold at least 20% of the Class A Common Stock issued or issuable upon conversion of the Preferred Shares (the "Underlying Common Stock") and, so long as they own at least 20% of the Preferred Shares, the Purchasers shall have the right to designate one person to serve as Purchaser Observer. The holders of the Preferred Shares also are entitled to vote, as a class, with holders of common stock on each matter submitted to a vote of the Company's stockholders. Each share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock has a number of votes equal to the number of shares of Class A Common Stock issuable upon conversion of a share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the Company filed a Certificate of Designation with the Secretary of State of Delaware, creating the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. Sales of Unregistered Securities See the disclosure under the immediately preceding heading ("Changes in Rights and Classes of Stock"). The shares were offered and issued in reliance upon the exemption from registration set forth in Rule 506 of the Securities Act and, in the alternative, under the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act set forth in Section 4(2) thereof. ITEM 3. DEFAULTS ON SENIOR SECURITIES None. ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS None. ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION None. ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K (a) Exhibits: 27.1 Financial Data Schedule for Period Ended July 31, 2000 27.2 Restated Financial Data Schedule for Period Ended July 31, 1999 (b) Reports on Form 8-K:

On July 6, 2000, the Company filed a Report on Form 8-K announcing a preferred stock purchase agreement with Berkshire Partners of Boston, Massachusetts and attaching the press release issued in conjunction with such agreement. On August 18, 2000, the Company filed a report on Form 8-K announcing the closing of the preferred stock transaction and attaching various agreements and other documents delivered in connection with the closing. SIGNATURE Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. Casella Waste Systems, Inc. Date: September 13, 1999 By: /s/ Jerry Cifor --------------------------- Jerry Cifor Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Duly Authorized Officer)

5 THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JULY 31, 2000 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED JULY 31, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINACIAL STATEMENTS AND THE FOOTNOTES THERETO.

3-MOS APR-30-2001 MAY-01-2000 JUL-31-2000 15,600 0 101,511 6,136 8,666 174,776 499,278 108,122 913,224 100,599 37,985 0 0 232 283,789 913,224 0 157,067 0 108,848 31,761 594 9,911 6,204 2,885 3,319 0 0 0 3,319 0.14 0.14

5 THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JULY 31, 1999 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED JULY 31, 1999, AS RESTATED TO REFLECT THE EFFECTS OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE FOOTNOTES THERETO.

3-MOS APR-30-2000 MAY-01-1999 JUL-31-1999 4,918 0 33,470 1,977 646 39,698 213,770 73,190 300,639 30,202 0 0 0 160 151,507 300,639 0 54,676 0 30,636 16,707 1,977 1,603 5,788 2,652 3,136 (95) 0 0 3,041 0.19 0.18